Olivier Audino
An ESG audit is a structured approach designed to assess how well a company controls its environmental, social and governance practices. Unlike a declaration or a communication document, an audit relies on facts, verifiable data and observable processes.
An ESG audit can be conducted internally or entrusted to an external third party, but its objective remains the same: measure the gap between stated commitments and operational reality. In organizations where procurement plays a central role, the audit largely depends on the quality of sustainable procurement practices , since a significant share of ESG impacts is located within the value chain.
ESG audits should not be confused with reporting. Where reporting describes, an audit verifies, challenges and highlights risk areas and improvement opportunities.
Many companies use these terms interchangeably, which often creates confusion and unrealistic expectations. In practice, these approaches serve different and complementary purposes.
ESG audits are no longer reserved for large corporations with strong media exposure. Today, they respond to several converging pressures that affect a growing number of organizations, regardless of their size or sector.
The first driver is regulatory. European requirements, reinforced by the introduction of CSRD, impose the production of verifiable and auditable sustainability data across the entire value chain, as outlined by the European Commission . Reporting can no longer rely on approximations or isolated declarations.
Commercial pressure is also increasing. More and more companies require formal ESG guarantees from their suppliers as a condition for remaining approved or competitive. In this context, procurement teams play a central role, especially when supplier practices are monitored through structured supplier risk management rather than informal checks.
Internal pressure should not be underestimated either. Without an ESG audit, management teams lack visibility on actual risks, data reliability and priority areas for action. ESG strategies then remain theoretical and difficult to steer.
In this context, the ESG audit acts as a reality check. It helps companies move away from declarative approaches and toward operational governance, particularly in complex areas such as procurement and supplier relationships. Organizations that engage in a structured ESG audit gain a solid foundation to prioritize actions, secure commitments and anticipate future regulatory expectations, especially on dispersed C-class purchasing flows.
In most organizations, a significant share of environmental, social and governance risks lies outside the company’s direct perimeter, within its value chain. Procurement therefore becomes a natural concentration point for these risks, as it connects the company to suppliers, service providers and partners.
Working conditions, environmental practices, regulatory compliance or critical dependencies cannot be assessed without a structured analysis of procurement practices. This is why ESG audits cannot rely solely on high-level policies and must be grounded in concrete data coming from supplier relationships, supported by supplier risk management .
Without clear visibility into suppliers and purchasing flows, ESG commitments remain largely theoretical and difficult to defend under audit conditions.
When an ESG audit is launched, attention usually focuses on strategic or critical suppliers. While this approach is understandable, it often leaves aside C-class purchasing, despite its high volume and dispersion.
C-class purchases present several characteristics that make audits more complex:
Due to this lack of structure, data related to C-class purchasing is difficult to consolidate and audit. Yet, experience shows that these flows represent one of the fastest levers to reduce ESG risk in the short term when addressed through tail spend management .
The impact of an ESG audit largely depends on the maturity of procurement practices. Two companies exposed to similar ESG challenges can reach very different conclusions depending on how their purchasing activities are structured and governed.
This contrast highlights why ESG audits act as a maturity indicator for procurement. Beyond compliance, they expose governance gaps and force organizations to clarify rules, responsibilities and processes, especially when supported by a structured procurement organization .
Beyond compliance, an ESG audit acts as a maturity revealer for the procurement function. It highlights gaps between expected practices and actual execution, forcing organizations to clarify responsibilities, rules and decision-making processes.
This governance dimension is critical. Without clear ownership of ESG topics within procurement, audits tend to produce generic observations that are difficult to translate into operational improvements. This is why ESG audits are closely connected to procurement organization design , which defines who decides, who controls and who is accountable.
When governance is weak, procurement practices rely on individual initiatives rather than shared rules. This makes ESG commitments fragile and hard to demonstrate during audits. Conversely, structured governance transforms the audit into a tool for continuous improvement rather than a one-off control.
From a procurement perspective, ESG audits typically trigger three governance effects:
This logic is closely linked to responsible purchasing , where governance is the condition that turns ESG principles into operational reality. Without it, audits remain descriptive; with it, they become decision-oriented.
When C-class purchasing is fully included in this governance framework, the impact is even stronger. These dispersed flows often reveal structural weaknesses that, once addressed, significantly improve both ESG compliance and overall procurement performance.
An ESG audit almost always starts with an assessment of the governance framework. The objective is to verify the existence, clarity and actual application of responsible purchasing policies, including supplier codes of conduct, internal rules and control mechanisms.
Without a formalized framework, practices rely on individual initiatives and become difficult to audit. European sustainability requirements reinforced by CSRD explicitly state that commitments must be translated into documented operational rules, as highlighted by both the CSRD regulatory framework and the work conducted by EFRAG on ESRS standards.
The second critical area concerns supplier data. ESG audits assess the company’s ability to identify suppliers, qualify their practices and document compliance with ESG requirements. This assessment must rely on measurable criteria rather than unverified declarations.
Structured approaches to supplier compliance and SRM make it possible to objectify these elements and reduce subjectivity. Data gaps are particularly frequent in C-class purchasing, where supplier volumes make information collection and maintenance more complex.
An ESG audit does not stop at policies and commitments. It also examines how purchasing activities are actually executed: purchase requests, orders, invoices and payments. These flows constitute essential evidence to demonstrate alignment between commitments and real practices.
The quality of processes directly conditions auditability. Structured approaches to supplier invoice management help secure transactional flows and reduce blind spots.
ESG audits also assess the company’s ability to trace data and produce consistent indicators. The objective is not only to measure performance, but to explain how figures are built, controlled and maintained over time.
Implementing supplier traceability practices makes it possible to link ESG data to suppliers and procurement flows, strengthening credibility during audits.
Finally, ESG audits review how results are monitored over time, how gaps are addressed and how corrective actions are implemented. Without monitoring, audit findings quickly lose their impact.
A high-performance purchasing dashboard is a key lever to transform audit findings into concrete, measurable decisions.
Together, these areas form the backbone of an effective procurement-focused ESG audit. Their analysis makes it possible to move from declarative ESG commitments to a managed, auditable and performance-driven approach, including across complex C-class purchasing flows.
An effective ESG audit always starts with a clear scoping phase. The objective is to define precisely what will be audited, which procurement categories are in scope and what level of evidence is expected. Without this initial alignment, audits tend to produce generic findings that are difficult to translate into operational actions.
From a procurement perspective, this phase typically involves identifying priority purchasing categories, supplier typologies and the most exposed purchasing flows. Companies that already rely on C-class spend audits gain significant efficiency by focusing directly on high-risk and highly dispersed areas.
The scoping phase must also clarify the reference frameworks used for the audit, including internal policies, regulatory requirements and ESG standards, to avoid ambiguity during assessment.
The next step consists of collecting the data required for the audit: documents, indicators, operational evidence and interviews with procurement teams. This phase often reveals the true maturity level of the procurement function.
When procurement data is fragmented or poorly structured, ESG audits quickly highlight significant gaps between expected and actual practices. Approaches based on centralized purchasing significantly simplify this phase by reducing reliance on manual files.
Based on the collected data, the ESG audit aims to identify gaps between defined requirements and actual practices. This assessment goes beyond a binary compliant / non-compliant view and focuses on qualifying risk levels.
Risks are prioritized according to their potential impact and likelihood, particularly in dispersed areas such as C-class purchasing. Methodologies related to supplier risk analysis help objectify this prioritization.
The presentation of audit results is a critical step. Decision-makers must quickly understand where the main risks lie and which levers should be activated first. An ESG audit without actionable recommendations loses most of its value.
Expected deliverables go beyond a simple report. They should include a clear roadmap built around concrete, realistic and prioritized actions that procurement teams can implement.
When properly conducted, an ESG audit becomes a structuring tool for procurement. It not only secures compliance but also establishes a dynamic of continuous improvement, including across complex C-class purchasing flows.
One of the most frequent mistakes is treating an ESG audit as a communication exercise, focused on messaging rather than evidence. An ESG audit must demonstrate observable facts: processes, data, controls, decisions and corrective actions.
With reinforced European requirements, expectations are increasingly audit-proof. Transparency and verifiability principles are clearly stated within the CSRD framework available on EUR-Lex , which reinforces the need to approach ESG audits as control and governance exercises.
Limiting ESG audits to strategic suppliers may appear logical, but it creates a major blind spot: dispersed purchasing flows. In many organizations, the majority of suppliers belong to C-class purchasing, where data is often poorly structured.
Without extending audits to these flows, companies miss real risk exposure and data quality issues. This is often where undocumented suppliers, heterogeneous practices and non-compliant documentation are found, particularly when tail spend remains unmanaged.
An ESG audit cannot rely on inconsistent or outdated data. Without clear quality rules covering formats, ownership and update frequency, audit findings become debatable and difficult to operationalize.
Structured supplier management supported by SRM practices helps stabilize master data and industrialize information collection, reducing errors and omissions.
Many ESG audits focus on policies and commitments while neglecting operational evidence. However, actual practices are reflected in execution: purchase requests, orders, invoices, payments and disputes.
Securing these flows is a prerequisite for auditability. Approaches related to supplier payment optimization strengthen traceability and reduce gaps between stated policies and real execution.
ESG audits often fail when they stop at findings. An audit only creates value when it leads to a prioritized roadmap, clear responsibilities and measurable follow-up.
One of the most common mistakes after an ESG audit is attempting to address all identified gaps simultaneously. This approach dilutes effort and delays tangible results. A well-used ESG audit, on the contrary, helps procurement teams prioritize actions based on actual risk levels and operational impact.
Effective prioritization typically considers several criteria: ESG criticality, transaction volumes, regulatory exposure and operational capacity. Organizations that follow this logic transform audits into decision-support tools rather than static assessments.
Once priorities are defined, standardization becomes a key lever. It reduces variability, improves data reliability and facilitates future audits. Without common rules, each new audit tends to reproduce the same findings.
Structured purchasing standardization initiatives help establish shared processes, data formats, validation rules and clearly assigned responsibilities. This approach is particularly effective for C-class purchasing, where reducing variability quickly improves both compliance and performance.
Turning ESG audits into lasting performance requires appropriate tooling, but without unnecessary complexity. The objective is not to multiply systems, but to support existing processes and strengthen traceability.
Approaches related to B2B procurement optimization show that tooling is effective when it follows a simple logic: centralize information, automate key controls and facilitate monitoring.
The true value of an ESG audit emerges over time. Once actions are launched, progress must be monitored, new gaps identified and practices adjusted. Without monitoring, audit benefits erode quickly.
Structured approaches to procurement ROI monitoring help connect compliance, performance and value creation through a limited set of actionable indicators.
When leveraged this way, ESG audits become a true accelerator of procurement maturity. They help secure compliance while sustainably improving efficiency and control, including across complex C-class purchasing flows.
An ESG audit is not an end in itself. It is first and foremost a management tool designed to identify where real risks, gaps and priorities lie. When properly conducted, it provides an objective and fact-based view of procurement practices, beyond intentions and corporate statements.
In a context of reinforced regulation and increasing expectations from customers and business partners, ESG audits have become a critical foundation for securing the credibility of ESG commitments. They also enable organizations to anticipate future obligations, particularly those related to CSRD, by relying on reliable and auditable procurement data, as emphasized by the European Commission .
The real challenge lies in transforming audit findings into concrete actions. This requires a progressive structuring of procurement practices, especially for C-class purchasing, which is often the most exposed and least controlled. Organizations that adopt this approach turn ESG audits into a sustainable lever for procurement performance and governance.
If you want to structure your approach, prioritize actions and secure your procurement practices through an operational ESG lens, you can rely on our procurement consulting services .
An ESG audit provides a global assessment of environmental, social and governance practices, with a strong focus on processes and data. A CSRD audit specifically aims to secure the information published as part of European regulatory reporting.
In practice, a well-structured ESG audit is a solid foundation for preparing CSRD compliance, particularly for procurement and supplier-related data.
There is no single frequency that fits all organizations. However, best practices usually include:
Yes. Procurement represents a standalone scope and can be audited independently. This approach is often relevant when ESG risks are concentrated within the supply chain.
A focused audit allows faster and more actionable results, particularly for C-class purchasing, without waiting for a broader company-wide audit.
An internal audit can be an effective starting point to identify initial gaps and structure the approach. However, an external audit provides an independent perspective, proven methodologies and stronger credibility with stakeholders.
The right option depends on the organization’s maturity level and objectives, whether internal steering, customer requirements or regulatory preparation.
The first step is to clarify scope and priorities: purchasing categories involved, supplier typologies and expected risk levels. It is then recommended to align teams and establish simple rules before launching a formal audit.
Initiatives such as procurement training help teams align on ESG challenges and prepare effectively for audit processes.
.svg){kind=small}